A friend and I took the opportunity to ride on the Canada Line, starting at Broadway-Cambie, going out to Richmond-Brighouse and then back to Waterfront station.
First, they were definitely doing their best to promote it, but I'm not sure their plan was well conceived. There was a promotional draw you could enter if you got your passport stamped at each of the stations on the line. However, at at least two stations the lineups to get on were half an hour or more, so only the truly dedicated would enter.
The other thing I noticed was the high profile of the armed transit police, at least at the Broadway-Cambie station. I've said that there is no need for armed guards on Skytrain, and I'll say the same thing about Canada Line. It did not make me feel welcome.
Once we actually got down the ramp to the train platform, the trains look pretty good. The aisle between the two rows of seats are about 1.5 to 2 times the width of the aisle on Skytrain. The trains accelerate smoothly and quietly. I actually miss the three-tone acceleration sound familiar from Skytrain. The train stopped a couple of times on our trip, which is not surprising on the first day of full operation.
A big part of the Vancouver portion of the line is underground, so there's little to navigate by, and no reason to look out the window. You could easily miss your stop because you can't see any familiar land mark.
My only gripe is that the stations and trains have bland design. Instead of the strong white, blue, red of the Skytrain system, there's just gray everywhere, with some pastels to lighten them. Kind of boring and soporific. The white enamel tunnels of the Granville Skytrain station always woke me up by comparison.
My other big question is whether the Canada Line will do what it claims it will do: ferry people from the airport to downtown. If I'm arriving with a month's worth of luggage for me and my family, will I want to get on a train, or will I just bite the bullet and hire a cab? Some of the literature suggests that trains that go to the airport will have open areas where people can put their luggage, but I didn't see that on the train I boarded.
Still, it should be good for trips into Richmond.
August 18 2009, 03:24:45 UTC 2 years ago
As for it being omg UNDERGROUND (this isn't directed solely at the OP - I've heard this a few times), a lot of cities have their metros solely underground, or at least mostly. Again, London comes to mind. So does NYC. And Prague. All cities where I have been able to navigate quite easily, despite not being able to see anything out the window. (And in Prague, the signs aren't even in English!! Can you imagine?!?!) Granted, I have not been on the Canada Line but I am making the assumption that the stations have their names on signs ... ?
August 18 2009, 05:32:58 UTC 2 years ago
I'm from Montreal, where all of the trains are underground (aka the Metro). You only miss your stop once before you learn to look up long enough at each stop to see where you are. I used to be able to sleep between stations and not miss my stop.
also, ss someone who has recently started traveling into the burbs on the skytrain, it doesn't matter if you can see the city or not if you don't know it well enough to recognize it. I've always navigated by stop name even on the skytrain. Now I'm learning the city because they have names that match the skytrain stations. So for me underground or above ground is irrelevant.
My car stopped between stations as well, and there was a sign on the wall saying which stops we were between (in case of emergency). However they will be tough to see if you're moving fast (unless you can see across the oncoming tracks to the far wall).
I thought it was great!
2 years ago
Deleted comment
August 18 2009, 06:15:09 UTC 2 years ago
Deleted comment
2 years ago
2 years ago
August 18 2009, 08:19:50 UTC 2 years ago
2 years ago
Deleted comment
2 years ago
Deleted comment
2 years ago
2 years ago
August 18 2009, 03:32:37 UTC 2 years ago
I figure the luggage situation will be much better than, say, the 98 B-line. But the people with lots will probably continue taking taxis, and I'm okay with that.
August 18 2009, 04:06:05 UTC 2 years ago
HELP
My problem is that I don't know how to verbalize the Canada Line.I'm __________ there.
Bus = busing
Skytrain = skytraining
What's the Canada Line considered? Not a subway. Not a skytrain. Some sort of hybrid of the two?
August 18 2009, 04:43:07 UTC 2 years ago
Re: HELP
"Canading"? :)2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
August 18 2009, 05:32:58 UTC 2 years ago
August 18 2009, 05:42:29 UTC 2 years ago Edited: August 18 2009, 05:48:41 UTC
August 18 2009, 06:42:55 UTC 2 years ago
2 years ago
August 18 2009, 08:21:46 UTC 2 years ago
August 18 2009, 06:11:33 UTC 2 years ago
Also, does anyone know: if you have a U-Pass, do you have to pay extra to go to the airport, or does the U-Pass cover that?
August 18 2009, 06:59:28 UTC 2 years ago
August 18 2009, 08:22:38 UTC 2 years ago
There is, I think, quite a bit of time to get on the trians. Also, our doors are wider than the skytrain doors, so easier to get luggage on.
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
August 18 2009, 06:57:45 UTC 2 years ago
From what I saw on Global News, you don't have to put your luggage in a designated area and then leave it unattended (because of course who would want to do that!). The reporter had his two suitcases and he was able to put them under the seat without too much fuss (of course he was a large able bodied man and the suitcases were presumably empty). Because the trains are wider, in theory you should be able to find a spot to stand with your luggage.
I'm sure going to the airport with lots of luggage at peak times wouldn't be particularly easy, but with light luggage when the trains are emptier should be ok.
The price is good, but if our flight is leaving at 6 am, I might not want to deal with the extra travel time/hassell that early in the morning , compared to taking a cab.
We should definitely try it out before Feb!
August 18 2009, 07:01:18 UTC 2 years ago
August 18 2009, 08:24:11 UTC 2 years ago
Re: early flights... the first train leaves Waterfront at 4:50, at it arrives at YVR at 5:15. The trains will be empty, and no fuss, so why take a cab then?
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
August 19 2009, 20:23:20 UTC 2 years ago
For people with a lot of luggage, a taxi into downtown would certainly be most convenient. But I would think people with manageable luggage would welcome the option of a metro line into downtown at such a good price (without the hassle of changing buses at Airport station and the perpetually overcrowded 98-B with almost no room for luggage).
2 years ago
Screened comment
August 18 2009, 15:35:10 UTC 2 years ago
2 years ago
August 18 2009, 13:44:35 UTC 2 years ago
As for the luggage issue, anything beyond one bag and a carryon is an extra fee (and a lot of airlines are now charging $25 and up for even that) so I'm assuming people packing multiple steamer trunks of crap are comfortable financially and will opt for the convenience of a cab. I travel as light as possible myself, even on long tours. I'm not going to have much sympathy for rich cheapskates packing six bags apiece onto the train, and in any case I'm assuming they'll be thin on the grond anyway.
Regarding "is it a train, is it a subway," when I lived in Vancouver I always just called it the train. "Skytrain" sounded silly and contrived to me.
August 18 2009, 16:34:46 UTC 2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
August 18 2009, 18:15:14 UTC 2 years ago
What I noticed in the Global news segment is that the reporter put his luggage under the seat (this isn't possible in the ART I or II skytrains (as they are both bolted to the floor)), the first comment was "ew your luggage is going to be covered in grime"
Are they going to clean the floors of the Canada Line's trains more often than they do on the Millenium line?
August 19 2009, 01:41:57 UTC 2 years ago